🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.